Rants


For the past four nights one of my smoke detectors (one of the fancy dual sensor ionization/photoelectric kind) has been beeping in the middle of the night.  Each morning I replace the battery and everything seems fine, until the house gets cold, and then the thing starts beeping again . . . yesterday I went out and bought MORE new 9V batteries . . . still same problem.

So I finally called the company BRK/First Alert.
I always take notes during and/or after these kinds of calls . . . here they are:

BRK/First Alert Smoke Detectors — garbage
Just called BRK about my First Alert SA710 smoke detector (only 2 years old) chirping when the house gets cold at night, even with brand new battery.  Only happens at night.  They gave me some crap about how the batteries must be certain brands and dates (Energizer, Duracell, post-2014). (Have already tried those as well as Rayovac, nothing works.)  They are willing to sned me a new one for $6.99 S&H.  For that I can by a new, cheaper SD that won’t eat batteries and will work correctly.

Just called BRK about my First Alert SA710 smoke detector (only 2 years old) chirping when the house gets cold at night, even with brand new battery.  Only happens at night.

They gave me some crap about how the batteries must be certain brands and dates (Energizer, Duracell, post-2014). (Have already tried those as well as Rayovac, nothing works.)

They are willing to send me a new one for $6.99 S&H.  For that I can by a new, cheaper SD that won’t eat batteries and will work correctly.

Only valuable info was how to discharge after removing battery (so it stops chirping): push button and hold for 20 sec

I should also note that this particular unit has gone through batteries much faster than any of my other smoke detectors (the others are Kidde and Universal brands).  This issue is particularly annoying to me because even though my house is very small (about 1000 sq ft), I was required to install additional smoke detectors when I got a couple of new windows . . . so I now have 3 (THREE) plus a CO detector upstairs  and 2 on the first floor and 2 plus a CO detector in the basement . . .

Ah, Minnesotans, they love laws and rules and regulations . . .

Piniella banishes Bradley after tantrum | cubs.com: News.

I wish they would banish Bradley to the minors.  I wonder if they thought to put an option in the contract that releases the Cubs from any obligation to pay him if he doesn’t behave professionally (or even like a grown up :)

Unfortunately, Lou only banished him for the afternoon and will put him back in tomorrow . . . which doesn’t really send much of a message.

Much more to write about the games since my previous post . . . including a confession that I’m now more of a Twins fan than a Cubs fan . . . .  I won’t be changing my blog header anytime soon, but I’m so fed up with the Cubs that I can barely watch them anymore.  Derrek Lee is just about the only decent hard-working guy left on that team.

Too late to go into all that now . . . just wanted to rant some more about Bradley.

We’re having a glorious day here in Lake Woe-be-gone, my home town. The temps are above freezing for the first time all month (which means we just blew a bunch of records for “worst January ever”). I ran errands this morning sans hat and gloves. Yippee! And now I’ve got two loaves of bread in various states of baking/rising down in my kitchen and sitting in a sunny window in the dining room.

Of course, an improvement in the weather means that something else has to tick me off. Today it is both UPS (unhelpful package sorcerers) AND the USPS (united society of poor service). This week we heard all kinds of whining from the United States Postal Service about how they were going broke (who decided they should be a separate, non-governmental, profit-making business?? ) and might only deliver mail 5 days a week. I was a bit surprised by this because I rarely get mail more than 5 days a week (even when I’m expecting something) and often my mail arrives after 7 pm. So I’m thinking how can they cut back even more? Then this morning I go to mail a package at the Post Office and learn that the new “rules” at the postal service forbid the “customer service” people from uttering the words “Parcel Post”. In fact, unless you specifically ASK for it, they are not even supposed to offer you anything cheaper than Priority Mail. I AM NOT KIDDING OR EXAGGERATING! The person at the counter told me this is the new policy when I asked why they were stamping my package “Standard Mail” instead of the old “Parcel Post”. SO, unless somebody knows that there is a cheaper rate, they will get charged the Priority Rate (which in my experience rarely arrives in the specified 2-days). One more way to sock it to people who are either new to the country and/or too young to remember when the postal service was quick, reliable, and relatively inexpensive. Of course, now that they aren’t really an arm of the US government, there probably isn’t much we can do about any of this . . . except rant.

At least I’ve been able to train my local USPS postal delivery person NOT to leave packages sitting on my front steps … where they are likely to either disappear and/or fall down the steps when I try to open the door to retrieve them. They actually ring the bell and see if I am home and/or leave the package between the storm and main doors and/or put the package on the back steps.

UPS is another ball of wax (spit?) all together . . . They’ve left packages labeled “Perishable” out in the sun on a 90° day and out in the snow on a -40° day. Once they even hid the box under some shrubs, where I just happened to find it (though it was fairly well hidden). When they do bother to ring the bell, you get about 2 seconds to get to the door, otherwise they leave (with your package if it required a signature). Yesterday I returned home from some shopping to find an “InfoNotice” indicating that they had tried to deliver my package from King Arthur Flour (though of course the source was not identified on the note, I just happened to know this package was on its way) and that they would try again on Monday (no more specific time indicated, though the form provides 4 time-frames) and that a signature is required. Not wanting my flour to sit in some bug-infested warehouse all weekend, I called the toll free number to see if I could just go pick up the package somewhere. I was told that if I were to make this request, someone would call me back in an hour or so (it was already 4:30pm) and tell me what time I had to go pick up the package. Lord knows WHERE in the WORLD the person I was speaking to was located. All I know is there was no way for me to call the local warehouse directly and speak to a human being to figure out what my options were. SO, my flour sits in the warehouse, I have to wait home all day on Monday for the package, and I just learned that the other three items in my order are being shipped IN THREE SEPARATE PACKAGES . . . so I get to go through this run-around all week.

These two incidents top off a month in which every time I had to contact “customer service” of any sort, I was basically given no service at all beyond . . . “see our website” (where I had already looked) or “we’re sorry, but we don’t know why that happened and there’s nothing you can do to prevent that from happening again” or “here’s an answer which reveals that I didn’t actually read/hear your actual question”. Mostly it just seems that the folks doing “customer service” really don’t know anything about the systems/products they are providing “service” for . . . they’ve just been given scripts to read and/or send via email.

Okay, enough ranting. Time to go take homemade bread out of the oven. At least I know THAT will be good!

Getting ready to head off to vote.  Drinking my coffee and waiting for my oatmeal to cook (so I’ll have a full tummy in case there’s a long line at the polls).

The day did not begin well.  The morons at Minneapolis Public Works picked today to start digging up the street in front of my house (which happens to be half a block from the local polling place).  At 6 am they arrived with their big truck and back hoe.  Since then they’ve added more heavy equipment.  They’ve just finished sawing the pavement and are now using jackhammers to break up the asphalt.

Some of you know that I have a bit of a bad history with jackhammers.  I worked in an office where they decided to jackhammer cinderblocks in the basement beneath my office at the same time they were tuckpointing bricks on the exterior of the building.  For a month I couldn’t hear myself think or talk on the phone because of the noise.  I lost a filling from the vibrations.  And I still have ringing in my ears.  Needless to say the sound and vibration of a jackhammer sets my nerves quite on edge.

I’m trying to re-vision the road work as part the revolutionary changes that I hope begin today . . . but it’s a stretch! :)

More after I return from the polls.

Two recent incidents caused me to exclaim “There ought to be a law against that . . .!”

Police Cars Should Not Be Permitted to Drive With Their Doors Open

Last Thursday, I saw two police cars driving down the road with their rear doors open and passengers in the back seat. I wrote down the squad car numbers and contacted the police department to find out WHY they were driving around with their doors open. Silly me, I thought that was against the law. According to the police, it is POLICE POLICY to leave the back doors open when transporting four police officers in a squad–(in case they need to “exit quickly due to an incident”). Apparently, the rear doors lock automatically and the only way to make sure the police can get out is to leave the doors open.

HELLO, can anyone say “power door locks”?

And a few more rhetorical questions:

  • How often has it been necessary for the officers in the back seat to “exit quickly due to an incident”?
  • Aren’t there safety features in the cars that allow for opening the back doors in an emergency when transporting non-officers? If not, shouldn’t there be?
  • How much of this policy is due to the officers in the front forgetting to let the officers in the back out once they get where they are going :)

A Business Selling “US Postal Services” Should Charge The Same Price As The Post Office

The other day I needed to mail an envelope via Priority Mail.  I was in a mini-mall (purchasing the item to go in the envelope) when I noticed the familiar red-white-&-blue eagle symbolizing the USPS in one of those places that will ship UPS or DHL, etc.  I went in and asked if their rates & services were the same as the post office.  They said “Yes, but no waiting in a long line!”  So, I packed up my items and started the process.  Indeed there was no line.  My suspicion should have started there . . .  I DID get suspicious when the salesperson started typing all my address information into his computer (they never do THAT at the post office).  And, of course the one-finger typing method used by the sales person meant that I had already spent more time waiting than I would have at the post office . . . Then he says, “That will be $6.95.” for something I knew should have been around $4.  I said “forget it” and went to the post office (where I paid $4.60).

Apparently, according to the folks at the post office, unless you are in a government-run United States Postal Service building, they can charge you ANYTHING THEY WANT for postal services–$10 for a stamp, $30 for an envelope, whatever.

Shouldn’t there be a law that says they need to clearly post (1) What the USPS fee for that service is and (2) what additional “convenience fee” they will impose?  Then I can decide in advance whether the “convenience” is worth the fee.  But NOOOOO!

Well enough ranting for today.

What laws would you add (or remove) from the books?